Suze, over at Obsolete Childhood has introduced a new prompt called “Answer Me This.” Suze says it’s “an alternative daily prompt” to the WordPress Daily Prompt, which she characterized as “ones that totally suck and are focused upon the young people here.
Anyway, her prompt question today is this:
Is euthanasia an immoral way to end a life? Please explain your response yea or nay.
It’s immoral, in my opinion, to not permit a terminally ill patient who is suffering a painful, prolonged death to have the opportunity for death with dignity. We euthanize dogs and cats and other animals who are on death’s door so that they don’t have to needlessly suffer. But humans shouldn’t be offered the same option? That’s cruel.
I live in California, which enacted the California End of Life Option Act in June 2016. It allows terminally ill adult residents in the state to access medical aid in dying by self-administering lethal drugs, provided specific circumstances are met. The law allows physicians to prescribe drugs to end the life of a terminally ill patient, often referred to as physician-assisted suicide.
I have a living will. It has a “Do Not Resuscitate” (DNR) provision that instructs that I should not receive cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) if my heart stops beating. It also encompasses my decision to not have any medical intervention with other critical or life-prolonging steps.
I definitely don’t want to be kept alive by artificial means if either my mind or body no longer function, and I don’t want to burden my family with the cost keeping an empty shell alive.