You’re going on a cross-country trip. Airplane, train, bus, car, or bike?
Been there, done that. I’ve flown across the country countless times, driven in a car at least a dozen times, ridden on a motorcycle twice, and taken a train twice. What I’ve never done is made a cross-country trek in a bus or on a bicycle.
When I was still working, most of my cross-country trips were via airplanes because time was of the essence. But since I retired, I haven’t set foot in an airplane and don’t plan to. I’m too old to think about biking across the country and I have no interest in taking a cross country bus trip. And even sitting in a car for five to eight hours a day doesn’t sound very appealing anymore.
And then there’s the train. A few years back, I had to go to Boston for personal reasons and decided, since I didn’t have any time constraints, that I was going to take a train from San Francisco to Boston instead.
Of course, there is no train that goes directly from San Francisco to Boston. But there is one that goes from San Francisco to Chicago, the California Zephyr. It runs daily from Emeryville/San Francisco to Sacramento, Reno, Salt Lake City, across the Rockies to Denver, and through the plains of Nebraska to Chicago.
That trip takes just north of 51 hours, so I booked something called a “roomette,” which is essentially a small, cubicle-sized room that converts to a sleeper at night. The accommodations also included three meals a day in a dining car and priority access to what they called a scenic-view lounge car.
From Chicago To Boston, I booked the Lake Shore Limited. From Chicago, it heads through South Bend, Cleveland, Buffalo, and Albany before arriving in Boston 19 hours later.
There was a lot I liked about my cross-country train experience:
- The scenery along the California–Nevada border (the Sierra Nevada Mountains) and on the Utah to Denver leg (the Rocky Mountains) was spectacular.
- The other passengers were very friendly. Seating in the dining car was “family-style,” and, as a person traveling alone, I was seated with three other travelers each time. I met some very nice people.
- Most of the passengers along the San Francisco to Chicago leg were vacationers, either old-timers like me, or families traveling with kids.
- Most of the passengers along the Chicago to Boston leg were kids going home for the weekend from college, a number of Amish families for some reason, or business people. Fewer families, fewer oldies than on the other train.
I only have two gripes about my cross-country train adventure. First, the trains don’t run on time. The train from San Francisco arrived in Chicago 5 1/2 hours late. The train bound for Boston left Chicago 35 minutes late and arrived in Boston 3 1/2 hours late.
My second gripe is that Amtrak’s funding has been cut way back, so most of the train cars are older and, while they are generally in good repair, they could use some sprucing up. (Duct tape holding certain parts together in the sleeping rooms and rest rooms is a dead giveaway.)
So, back to the question of the day. If I were going on a cross-country trip and time to get to the destination was not a factor, I would definitely take the train again.
Like this:
Like Loading...