It’s March 24, 2022. Welcome to Fandango’s One-Word Challenge (aka, FOWC). I will be posting each day’s word just after midnight Pacific Time (U.S.).
Today’s word is “recruit.”
Write a post using that word. It can be prose, poetry, fiction, non-fiction. It can be any length. It can be just a picture or a drawing if you want. No holds barred, so to speak.
Once you are done, tag your post with #FOWC and create a pingback to this post if you are on WordPress. Please check to confirm that your pingback is there. If not, please manually add your link in the comments.
And be sure to read the posts of other bloggers who respond to this prompt. Show them some love.
This, That, and the Other 
I am no longer an enlisted comment member Fandango 🙂
LikeLiked by 3 people
I wonder how “the great reset” recruits.
March 17: After a few days of disparaging articles written about me, today we look at whether [or not] the articles are justified and how they fit into a larger media agenda.
LikeLike
January 24: The annual “globalization ball” in Davos is upon us once again – a virtual event [now] for the second year …. how its founder Klaus Schwab [has been benefiting] from this gathering of the global elite.
LikeLike
January 30: There’s a [snowballing] corporate wave of homebuyers in the U.S. real estate market… forcing [the average family] to rent. …
LikeLike
January 28: … has there been sufficient transparency around Bill Gates’ own investments in Covid vaccines?
LikeLike
I imagine now we’ll need to be recruiting nurses, over again, and maybe conscripting them rather than treating them as free citizens.
I tend to skip the first approximately half minute of these videos >>
Treating people (such as nurses) with respect is too expensive and moral (in our bastardized system); “they” — the powerful in media and government — blamed the unvaccinated for this…
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 16th:
Superior natural immunity and Scotland’s
(lagging) adherence to masking/patronizing
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 22: After a request from the FDA to suppress vaccine data for the next 75 years, a 55,000-page set of Pfizer documents has recently been released [under court order]. Vaccine [efficacy] aside – why has it been so hard to gain access to data about vaccines [for which] we the public paid? {The British Medical Journal has something to say.}
LikeLike
Pfizer CEO has said that a fourth […] shot ‘is necessary’… not about profit… Don’t you even suggest it. [And don’t notice that Pfizer didn’t invent it.]
LikeLike
Fourth vaccine dose {?} – a medical expert’s evaluation (not prescription) [a medical salesperson isn’t an expert]
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m figuring this is referring to the same subject matter. This reporter/researcher/pundit, Kim, says 55 years and 330,000 pages. (Perhaps only 55,000 of them have come out so far?)
Kim Iversen: Pfizer Vax Docs Released By COURT ORDER, Data Will Tell The STORY About Side Effects · 2 weeks ago
LikeLiked by 1 person
The FDA argued, in court, that it could only [wanted to get away with being allowed to] release 500 pages per month (which would take until near the end of this century). They lost that contest in federal court and are required to release more as well as sooner.
March 11 ~2:50 in: Long list of “side effects to look out for” with vaccination
[ If Pfizer wanted doctors and nurses to know, why did it take court order?
And why is there no information or contact for where to report adversity? ] |
{First portion and last of video on a retracted treatment study with no marking
and on low incidence of infection in Uganda despite low vaccination rate. }
LikeLike
Kids Vax 6 mo – 6 yrs [and that’s not all]: The Breaking Press Release from Moderna · 5 days ago
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 5: A [preprint] study [with conflicting interest] featured in the New York Times [and more] once again reprises the assertion that the covid-19 pandemic began in the Wuhan market, not [the] lab. Case closed, then. Right?
LikeLike
As the WEF [a private and supposedly nonprofit org insinuating into government] pushes a digital ID … monitoring online behavior, purchases, biometrics, and more … are we headed for our own social credit system?
LikeLike
Two high-ranking prosecutors leading the Manhattan District Attorney’s investigation into Donald Trump abruptly resigned about a month ago… [and] The New York Times has [now] published the resignation letter of one of those … [Then …] texts show that Ginni Thomas, wife of Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, promoted … [a coup] to the former president’s chief of staff [Mark Meadows]. Finally, Mo Brooks and “conspiracy.”
LikeLike
Hilliard: Trump Asked Mo Brooks to ‘Rescind’ 2020 Results, Hold New Election
LikeLike
Like the pair of medical experts [long respected at the fda or cdc or the review body] who resigned after a decision of furthering to the number or demographics for shots, this pair of attorneys (referenced at the beginning of what I posted March 24 at 11:31 pm above and briefly mentioned here) resigned due to the newly-elected district attorney saying he decided in favor of not taking prosecution forward against Donald Trump.
https://en.padverb.com/er/the_conversation_rss-08-mar-2022-big-brother-is-watching
Not to be confusing, but this link is named for the interview at the start of the recording I finally found for the purpose of a different (latter) interaction and topic. I don’t dislike the first guest (and, in addition to that, there is a recorded hello by somone other than the interviewer prior to that first visiting person after you click the arrow). Yet it is at 15:55 in that you can hear the interview I said, earlier this month (for March 8), that I have been trying to find from TYT (a news and commentary presenter) in a form to share. I found a way. The video isn’t included; you can play the sound. It goes for a few minutes longer than just fifteen additional minutes after the first conversation ends; in other words, the second discussion is longer than the former on the same recording. This source was the first hint I had that this man — who had been hopeful of prosecution earlier and who is very knowledgeable on Trump — wasn’t sure, anymore, The Donald will face serious justice.
LikeLike
This will give you more context for who the featured guest is. And there is video here. I hope his tax plan (while he’s not a politician) does actually come out fairly soon.
https://www.c-span.org/video/?518027-9/open-phones-david-cay-johnston
In this q/a, he uses a contrasting term of “suite crime” as contrasted with “street” crime.
LikeLiked by 1 person
https://www.dcreport.org/2022/03/25/how-to-revive-the-trump-investigation-in-manhattan/
How to Revive the Trump Investigation in Manhattan
David Cay Johnston
By DAVID CAY JOHNSTON
March 25, 2022
2 Mins Read
LikeLiked by 1 person
Quote from the DC Report site: We hope DCReport followers will read my op-ed essay in [the] New York Daily News on how to revive the moribund criminal investigation of Donald Trump by the Manhattan district attorney’s office.
That op-ed begins:
For more than two years, seasoned Manhattan prosecutors, working with two grand juries, investigated Donald Trump’s finances, coming to the firm conclusion that the former president has committed numerous crimes. But when prosecutors Mark Pomerantz and Carey Dunne recommended an indictment earlier this year, Alvin Bragg… rejected their advice.
….
All Gov. Hochul needs to do is exercise her authority under Article 63, Section 2 {link} of New York’s executive law …
.…
The rest of my piece is available at https://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/ny-oped-trump-prosecution-can-continue-20220325-otvwiq3gzza5nlfqpf75zsupcu-story.html
The paper also ran an editorial {link}. It said that “Gov. Hochul should do as David Cay Johnston suggests in his Daily News op-ed.”
LikeLike