FOWC with Fandango — Ransom

Fandango
FOWC

It’s June 1, 2022. Welcome to Fandango’s One-Word Challenge (aka, FOWC). I will be posting each day’s word just after midnight Pacific Time (U.S.).

Today’s word is “ransom.”

Write a post using that word. It can be prose, poetry, fiction, non-fiction. It can be any length. It can be just a picture or a drawing if you want. No holds barred, so to speak.

Once you are done, tag your post with #FOWC and create a pingback to this post if you are on WordPress. Please check to confirm that your pingback is there. If not, please manually add your link in the comments.

And be sure to read the posts of other bloggers who respond to this prompt. Show them some love.

12 thoughts on “FOWC with Fandango — Ransom”

  1. donmatthewspoetry June 1, 2022 / 2:51 am

    ODE TO RANSOM

    Kidnapped my favourite teddy
    100 dollar ransom
    Why 100 dollar?
    They know I’m richer than some

    Best I can do Fan……..

    Liked by 2 people

  2. bushboy June 1, 2022 / 4:45 am

    You’ll pay for using this prompt Fandango 🙂

    Liked by 2 people

  3. Pingback: Desperately Seeking Tranquillity – Debbie Gravett
  4. Pingback: Hard Bargain – Mister Bump
  5. Pingback: Bright And New – Louis N. Carreras, Woodcarver
  6. Pingback: Spousal Failure | lifelessons – a blog by Judy Dykstra-Brown
  7. Pingback: FOWC with Fandango: Ransom | Chronicles of an Anglo Swiss
  8. Pingback: A Citizen’s Ransom – pictures imperfect blog
  9. Pingback: Spousal Failure | lifelessons – a weblog by Judy Dykstra-Brown - Nitusa
  10. Pingback: Double Word Prompt – Let's Write……
  12. Marleen June 4, 2022 / 6:37 am

    The privacy of a number of citizens in California are apparently the ransoms sought by lawless or negligent law enforcement. Or just some of the stuff. Maybe there’s a statute about all the stuff if enough time goes by.

    https://reason.com/2021/05/10/the-fbi-seized-heirlooms-coins-and-cash-from-hundreds-of-safe-deposit-boxes-in-beverly-hills-despite-knowing-some-belonged-to-honest-citizens/

    Quote: “It was improper that the government seized these possessions in the first place, unconscionable that they are using them as hostages to pressure owners to divulge private information, and outrageous that they apparently treated the possessions so carelessly that they seem to have lost at least some of them,” Gluck tells Reason.

    Liked by 1 person

Comments are closed.