Fandango’s Flashback Friday — October 1st

Wouldn’t you like to expose your newer readers to some of your earlier posts that they might never have seen? Or remind your long term followers of posts that they might not remember? Each Friday I will publish a post I wrote on this exact date in a previous year.

How about you? Why don’t you reach back into your own archives and highlight a post that you wrote on this very date in a previous year? You can repost your Friday Flashback post on your blog and pingback to this post. Or you can just write a comment below with a link to the post you selected.

If you’ve been blogging for less than a year, go ahead and choose a post that you previously published on this day (the 1st) of any month within the past year and link to that post in a comment.


This was originally posted on October 1, 2018. Politically, not much has changed since then.

Democrats and Republicans

AE32E48D-A4FD-46E3-BF88-E95FEAD232EB

Groucho Marx once said, “All people are born alike — except Republicans and Democrats.”

Unfortunately, what Groucho said decades ago is even more true today. The partisan divide is at an extreme like I have personally never experienced — and I lived through the Vietnam era, when this country was very politically divided.

We all share stereotypical views of those on the other side of the aisle. For example, if someone you’d never met learned that you were a Republican, they would likely assume that you are not black, lesbian, gay, transgender, bisexual, nonreligious, or Jewish. If they learned you were a Democrat, they would likely believe that you are not a white evangelical Christian and you don’t live in a rural part of the county.

Most Democrats are left-leaning, liberal, and are usually associated with progressiveness and equality. Most Republicans are right-leaning, conservative, and are associated with big business, economic freedom, and with self-reliance. But to be fair, “most” doesn’t mean “all.” There are plenty of crossovers, like me, a social liberal and a fiscal conservative.

I consider political party affiliation to be like religion. When babies are born, they have no religion. But they are taught about religion from their parents and most children embrace the religious beliefs of their families and maintain those beliefs into and throughout adulthood.

Similarly, babies are not born either Democratic or Republican. But they will typically embrace and follow the political leanings of their families.

My question is what has happened to moderates within either political party? These days moderates are ridiculed as being either RINOs or DINOs (i.e., Republicans/Democrats In Name Only) and of being disloyal to their party (even when being loyal to their party is being disloyal to their country). Political compromise and a willingness to negotiate with the other side are considered signs of weakness.

It’s a sad state of affairs when the primary purpose of a political party is to do everything it can to stymie the other party, thus effectively blocking the government from getting much of anything done. For anybody.

42 thoughts on “Fandango’s Flashback Friday — October 1st

  1. Mister Bump UK October 1, 2021 / 3:25 am

    The US is a strange place when viewed from Europe, because we see one party which is extreme right, and another party which is even righter.

    But it is a common faining – to decry someone with whom we might have a 10% disagreement, conveniently forgetting that we have 90% agreement. It is a trap I fall into myself.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Fandango October 1, 2021 / 5:45 am

      You’re perspective of one party being extreme right and the other being even righter is wrong. Both used to have a number of moderates, either conservative or liberal. Now, the Republican Party has very few moderate conservatives and, especially since Trump, most have moved to the extreme right. The Democrats have more moderates than the Republicans, but a much larger caucus within the Party, known as the progressives, have moved further to the left. And the chasm between the two parties, much to the detriment of our nation, now seems almost unbridgeable.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Marleen October 1, 2021 / 6:23 pm

        I see most of the progressives (and some of the establishment Democrats) as moderate.

        Liked by 1 person

  2. margaret21 October 1, 2021 / 7:56 am

    One of the difficulties of an adversarial, winner takes all system is that this polarisation is fostered and encouraged. Both the UK and USA are the losers for embracing this kind of system. Oh, and I, like many of my friends, have completely gone over to ‘the other side’, rejecting my parents’ political beliefs hook line and sinker.

    Liked by 1 person

  3. Marilyn Armstrong October 1, 2021 / 2:51 pm

    I read some news this morning. My stomach started to churn. I turned on “Lucifer.” I cannot deal with this crap. It’s SO stupid. How stupid are we? We aren’t going to do even those things EVERYONE agrees on? We need a different government. This one is not working at all. Hopeless.

    Liked by 2 people

    • Fandango October 1, 2021 / 10:39 pm

      I’ve gotten to the point where I can’t handle reading or watching the news. I’m beginning to relate to that expression, “ignorance is bliss.”

      Like

  4. Marleen October 1, 2021 / 6:32 pm

    Joe Manchin REALLY Doesn’t Like Being Asked About His Coal Money 153K views · 23 hours ago

    Liked by 1 person

    • Marleen October 2, 2021 / 7:50 am

      Alex Jones LOSES BIG Lawsuits 189K views · 10 hours ago

      Liked by 1 person

    • Marleen October 4, 2021 / 3:38 pm

      Entitled Joe Manchin Complains About ‘Entitlement Mentality’

      Liked by 1 person

  5. mosckerr October 3, 2021 / 6:15 am

    The Purpose of Writing this blog. To some degree bases itself upon the book: Six Days of War, by Michael B. Oren. P.2: While it may be useless to try to pinpoint the cause or causes of the Middle East war of 1967, one can describe the context in which that war became possible. Much like the hypothetical butterfly that, flapping its wings, gives rise to currents that eventually generate a storm, so, too, might small, seemingly insignificant events spark processes leading ultimately to cataclysm.

    View myself as a totally insignificant butterfly of a person. But this tiny, mostly ignored blog, hopes to spark public criticism of Reshonim scholarship decisions made and expressed through their commentaries written on the Talmud and T’NaCH literature. Yeshiva Orthodox education forbids criticism of these early secondary sources. This decision, it seems to me — just plain wrong. The current cat-fights within the Israeli Knesset, I bring as primary evidence that leadership decisions inspire open and critical debates.

    Any study of rabbinic scholarship, especially during the Middle Ages prior to Napoleon liberating our People from the war criminal ghetto gulags, merits criticism and close scrutiny. It takes two hands to clap. Despite the lack of physical evidence which supports this thesis, my gut tells me that church leadership alone in the 16th Century, could never have succeeded in implementing ghetto gulags, spread across Europe and Russia, without the support of Kapo like Jews – modeled after Max Naumann (12 January 1875 – May 1939), founder of Verband nationaldeutscher Juden. This disgrace for a human being compares to the likes of Benedict Arnold, John Amery, Harold Cole, Vidkun Quisling, Philippe Pétain etc., criminals who supported the Nazis, and assisted in the war against the Jews of Europe.

    The introduction of political Zionism late in the 19th Century, it serves as an example of the butterfly effect, which so aroused nationalism and international wars that followed thereafter. Rabbinic Orthodoxy’s reaction to Zionism so contrasts with their total failure to denounce and destroy the Ari false gnostic kabbala\forbidden additions to the sealed Jewish masoret. This radical mystic kabbala perverted the classic מעשה בראשית masoret, as expressed through the Siddur; it opened the gates of tuma which history refers to as the false messiah heresies. That gnostic kabbala butterfly effect produced, so to speak, a unique social chaos chain reaction which culminated in the Cossack pogroms of 1648.

    A study of history entails much more than people, dates, and places. Before the Peace of Westphalia (1648), the numerous German principalities under the Holy Roman Empire restricted and limited their autonomy; these principalities could not conduct foreign affairs that resulted mutual treaties with other countries or empires. The removal of these legal restrictions effectively transformed these German principalities into Independent States.

    According to Frank Chiang, The One-China Policy: State, Sovereignty, and Taiwan’s International Legal Status, 2018. Modern States share some four common features: (1) the people; (2) a territory in which the people inhabit; (3) a ruler—a king or a sovereign prince—who bears sovereignty; and (4) the capability to engage in relations with other States. It seems to me, that European hostile rhetoric propaganda seeks to subvert the Jewish State; by shoving these four rules, magically concealed through false but repeated declarations of “International Law”, which intend to turn Samaria and Eastern Jerusalem into a kind of “Foie Gras”! As if Israel exists as a domesticated goose under the authority of the EU, Russia, and UN.

    Arab refugees populations, captured as a consequence of the victory of the 2nd Israeli War of Independence, have no rights. The moral outrage expressed by European Capitals completely ignores the treatment Jews received under European rule for over 2000 years, which terminated in the Shoah\Final Solution. European Capital lost their First among equals, first world status – following their defeat in WW ll. Israel does not recognize the right of any European government to sit as a permanent member on the UN Security Council. Both London and Paris merit no respect, they both aided the Nazi war effort to exterminate the Jews of Europe.

    These dethroned and defrocked ‘Great Powers’, the moral cowardice of their leaders, openly encouraged the lessor States of Europe to follow suit. The same holds true with the Reshonim scholarship on the Talmud following the Rambam Civil War. The same chain of consequences resulted in the Yankee war of aggression against the South. The Yankee victors replaced a Constitutional Republic of States, with a corrupt democracy.

    This post Civil War democracy, continually expands the voting franchise unto individuals not politically educated, and who have little or no stake in the political decisions, that these ‘democratically elected leaders’ effect upon the lives of the People; lobbies have replaced Governors and State Legislatures as the dominating influence over the Federal Congress persons and Senators. Lobbies write the Bills which bribed Congressmen and Senators present to Congress. Herein defines the corruption of Washington which ultimately define American law.

    The Rambam Civil War produced a similar corrosive deterioration upon the scholarship of both the Talmud and T’NaCH. Rabbinic leadership thereafter gave but mere lip service to the contrasting kabbala masoret of פרדס ומעשה בראשית as did the post Civil War Yankee governments in Washington honor and respect States Rights. Yeshiva educated, and how much more so, the common man on the street, neither Jew has the slightest idea how the kabbala of מעשה בראשית defines the k’vanna required to da’aven through the Siddur; the mitzvot of kiddushin and get\agunah and all positive time oriented commandments דאורייתא ודרבנן.

    Rabbinic Judaism does not strive to define tohor, contrasted by tuma, middot. Despite the fact that the Gemara of ברכות emphatically teaches that tefillot function in the stead of korbanot. Today the rote ritual of da’avening tefilla duplicates the offering of a barbeque unto Heaven, whereby king Shaul defied the commandment of the prophet Shmuel, and profaned his anointing as the Moshiach. King Shaul effectively turned the Moshiach blessing, into a Torah curse; just as when the people who originally asked the prophet Shmuel for a king; and rain, during the dry season, immediately thereafter fell!

    In 1948 and 1967 secular Jewry secured victory for the Jewish people by winning our two wars of Independence. A tremendous accomplishment. But the continued home rule of the Jewish people upon these lands, based upon the Torah as our Constitutional masoret, requires from all generations of Jews thereafter, strive to establish: (1) The Torah as the Written Constitution of the Cohen Republic of States. (2) Rebuild the Cities of Refuge, and therein establish the lateral courts of common law; the small and Great Sanhedrin(s) authorized to impose lashes as the defining criminal code of Jewish law as opposed & contrasted by Penitentiary Ghettos which define the western codes of criminal justice. Justice must restore compensation for damages imposed – in a quick and fair manner by the lateral Common Law Courts. (3) Cut a canal which connects the Mediterranean with the Salt Sea; to cause rain to fall upon the Negev and Sahara deserts. The intent, to send the Arab refugee populations, currently temporarily residing within Israel, to farm these now fertile crop producing lands of North Africa. The Torah blessing of causing rain to give life unto barren Wilderness lands, promises to transform Egypt and North African States unto the main trading partners of the Cohen Republic of Israel.

    Like

  6. Marleen October 3, 2021 / 7:14 am

    Err… REALLY??! Afghan Viral Video Marine Now JAILED!!!

    Like

    • Marleen October 3, 2021 / 7:33 am

      “You LIED & My Friends Are DEAD!” Iraq War Vet DESTROYS George Bush

      Liked by 1 person

    • Marleen October 3, 2021 / 8:40 pm

      Assange Kidnapping Plot Sheds New Light On COMPLICITY Of Congress

      Like

    • Marleen October 11, 2021 / 1:19 am

      BREAKING: Key Witness In Assange Case Who Recanted Testimony Is ARRESTED In Iceland

      Liked by 1 person

    • Marleen October 3, 2021 / 8:37 pm

      https://en.m.wiktionary.org › wiki › Tory

      Noun. Tory ( plural Tories ) ( UK politics) A member or supporter of the Conservative Party, which evolved from Royalist politicians; historically associated with upholding the rights of the monarchy and the privileges of the established Church. (by extension) One who is like a British Tory; someone politically conservative.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Marleen October 4, 2021 / 6:46 pm

        Neil Oliver: Government leaders [for billionsires] are frightened of their own people – and there’s a lot of us

        Like

  7. Marleen October 4, 2021 / 3:35 pm

    Prof. Eddie Glaude Schools MSNBC’s Morning Joe On Budget Bill Fight

    Liked by 1 person

  8. Marleen October 6, 2021 / 7:16 am

    Ana Kasparian Debates Ben Shapiro: Highlights 120K views · 8 hours ago

    Liked by 1 person

  9. Marleen October 6, 2021 / 9:29 am

    MSNBC & CNN Turn Against ‘Corporate Democrats’ While Daily Beast Posts ABSURD Sinema Fluff Piece 69K views · 23 hours ago

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s