SoCS — Planets, Stars, and Dark Money

For this week’s Stream of Consciousness Saturday prompt, Linda G. Hill has given us the word “astronomical.” As you know doubt already know, “astronomical” has two main definitions. First, it’s “of or relating to astronomy,” as in “astronomical observations.” Second, it more informally means “enormously or inconceivably large or great,” as in “he ate an astronomical number of doughnuts.”

I’m going to use the word both ways in this post. First, related to astronomy.532C3D4C-2FF4-4726-9428-E8C93FBAF02FOver the past few nights, except for last night when it was cloudy, I noticed a very bright, white object in the southern sky when I was walking our dog for her last walk of the day. I knew that the object I saw was a planet and not a star because it didn’t twinkle.

Did you know that stars twinkle because of something called astronomical scintillation? Stars are so distant that they appear as pinpoints of light in the night sky, and because all the light is coming from a single point, its path is highly susceptible to atmospheric interference. As the starlight travels through the blanket of air around our planet, it is diffracted (bounced around) causing a quick apparent dimming and brightening — a star’s signature “twinkle.”

But unlike stars, planets don’t twinkle. Because they are much closer to Earth, planets appear as tiny disks in the sky. Their apparent sizes are usually larger than the pockets of air that would distort their light, so the diffractions cancel out and the effects of astronomical scintillation are negligible.

Anyway, I wanted to know what planet that bright, white object was, so I downloaded an app for my iPhone and, based upon its position in the sky — almost due south — I confirmed my suspicions. That bright, white object in the southern sky was the planet Jupiter, and it was easily visible with the naked eye! Did any of you see Jupiter?

The other use of the word “astronomical” is related to its informal use as an extremely large amount. Have you ever heard of “dark money”?8FC3FE24-D889-447A-ACC6-C21D3825046CDark money refers to political spending meant to influence the decision of a voter, where the donor is not disclosed and the source of the money is unknown. Depending upon the circumstances, dark money can refer to funds spent by a political nonprofit or a super PAC.

Ever since 2010, when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in what is known as the Citizens United case, an obscenely astronomical amount of dark money has found its way into American politics, allowing special interests, big corporations, and even foreign interests, spend huge sums of money to benefit candidates and causes that will help these donors achieve their objectives. In other words, these extraordinarily wealthy donors have bought and paid for politicians using dark money and much of it can’t be attributed to specific donors, entities, or even countries.

Thank you, SCOTUS, for paving the way for the buying of America.

Okay. That’s All Folks.bd97b21b-0ddd-4a23-a961-ec833b7b60af.png

8 thoughts on “SoCS — Planets, Stars, and Dark Money

    • Fandango August 3, 2019 / 7:53 am

      The only camera I have is on my iPhone and it’s not that good of taking a decent picture of Jupiter. It’s almost enough to motivate me to invest in a really high quality digital camera.

      Liked by 1 person

      • pensitivity101 August 3, 2019 / 8:01 am

        We have some glorious night skies here once the street lights go off! That’s what we liked in the cottage, no white light to detract from the beauty of the Big Dipper, Orion’s belt and Cassiopeia, so when a planet became visible, it was awesome!

        Liked by 1 person

  1. Sadje August 3, 2019 / 8:31 am

    The first part was very interesting information. The second is just depressing. 🥺

    Liked by 1 person

    • Marleen August 3, 2019 / 11:53 am

      Warning: this one ends up as an advertisement; don’t contribute to the advertiser. I think the music is a good pairing, but — as usual — so-called conservatives get the meaning wrong.

      Supreme Court Justice Alito shakes his head at Obama and mouths the words “Not true” in his own version of “You lie”.

      Liked by 1 person

    • Marleen August 3, 2019 / 12:02 pm

      Justice Alito, you owe President Obama an apology | Opinion

      Posted Dec 23, 2018

      Ronald A. Klain has been a Washington Post contributing columnist since 2017. He is a lawyer in Washington…


      So was Obama wrong when he said that Citizens United had opened “the floodgates” for foreign entities to influence our elections?

      Sadly, no.

      …….. Clearly, as Obama warned, “foreign entities” affected our elections.


      Liked by 1 person

      • Marleen August 3, 2019 / 12:48 pm

        Moscow Mitch Gets TROLLED By Democrats

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.